Clear Bubble Inside My Lip

ordered to pay seigniorage!

( by La Repubblica, 30/09/2005, based on http://www.adusbef.it/ )

E per via Nazionale rischio megarisarcimento.
Sì al ricorso di un cittadino contro il "signoraggio".

ROMA - Il primo colpo al diritto di signoraggio arriva da un giudice di Pace di Lecce, Cosimo Rochira. Ha condannato la Banca d'Italia a pagare 87 euro a un cittadino italiano. Il motivo? Bankitalia ha trattenuto indebitamente una somma che di diritto spetta allo Stato italiano.
E' un istituto antico il signoraggio, che ha perso valore col tempo. Una volta il sovrano batteva monete d'oro, ne garantiva il valore e in cambio della garanzia tratteneva una parte di quell'oro. Non è più così, nemmeno le riserve auree garantiscono più la moneta. Tanto che sulle banconote gone is the word "payable to bearer." Seigniorage and the proceeds end up but remained in the vaults of Bank of Italy.
" the problem and hence the conviction - said lawyer Antonio Tanza dell'Adusbef, who oversaw the proceedings - is that for years Palazzo Koch no longer belongs to the state, but private banks. So citizens have continued to pay what has become a sort of tax credit institutions, in violation of those statutes of the Bank of Italy that Article 3, paragraph 3 is clear: the bank belongs to the State .
So was the conclusion of the court diversion of seigniorage income to the detriment the community is 87 per individual citizen . And the others? "Our goal - Tanza says - is asking that the stolen goods be returned to the state. It is about 5 billion € . E 'ready an open letter to Economy Minister Tremonti. (B.ar.).


Palazzo Koch, the seat of the Bank of Italy

If we wanted to make us two calculations ...
87 € per person for 5 billion is equivalent to 57,888,245 people, 36 million, 277.315 million euro.
nothing compared to the mammoth public debt (1.439.755.000.000, 1439 billion euro), only 0.35% of public debt.

LECCE, COURT OF PEACE: THE BANK OF ITALY 87 EURO TO RETURN TO ANY NATIONAL

(AGE) LECCE - The Bank of Italy has been ordered to repay to each Italian, to the citizens of minors , 87 €. This is money that the IRS has taken over the years because of the so-called seigniorage, a total estimated at 5 billion euro. L 'has established a ruling of the magistrate of Lecce, Cosmo Roche and will remain in history. Seigniorage is the difference between the legal value of a coin and its production costs. It 's the gain of the state issuing the currency. A considered sacrosanct right until the Bank of Italy has been a public corporation. But since 1990 the property has increased by 5% the institute INPS, the remaining 95% to private banks and insurance companies, in turn, owners of other banks. The right of seigniorage would therefore lapsed. The Bank of Italy no longer private, but public can not continue to collect money from state taxpayers. The dispute had been raised by the national vice president dell'Adusbef, Antonio Tanza www.studiotanza.it that your site has made available to users in the form to request the return of stolen goods, at no additional charge.
(AGE) LTR

What Happens If You Swallow Plax With Alchohol

Arrigo Molinari




September 27, 2005 The former superintendent of Genoa Arrigo Molinari is found dead in his home.
The murder occurred during the night, the two deaths caused by stabbing.

September 28, 2005
murderess The suspect confessed to his lawyer to be convicted of murder.

Apparently so close yet another tragic Italian.
only two days between the "attempted theft" led to murder (the night between 25 and 26 / 9) and the "Confession of the Assassin" (afternoon of 28 / 9). In just over 48 hours all the pieces go to their right place and the case could already be considered closed.

doing research on the Internet, however, we find the news interesting about Arrigo Molinari. The source
us most about him and the newspaper "The newspaper from which we learn the following facts.

Former Quaestor municipality to court for damages Bank of Italy ( news of 04.09.2005) "for not having done a 'proper form of supervision on the Bank of Rome as his partner in a previous judicial proceedings. "

The day after the murder, "The Journal" publishes an unpublished interview in which it is clear against whom it was made Arrigo Molinari. These are excerpts below, you can read the full interview here (from www.ilgiornale.it - \u200b\u200b"My last fight against the euro") .

"[...] I do have with the Bank of Italy and its partners greedy private bankers [...] against the Bank of Italy and European Central Bank for the so-called scam "Seigniorage," allowed the same since 1992 [...] slim that a minister has allowed banks to take control of their private arbitrator Bank of Italy, and then to coin money and lend it the state with the same discount rate for private banks

[...] Now the citizens are forced investors to make use of the court to be returned urgently income from seigniorage to the community, as a result of expropriation by Italian private banks, by a coup, thanks to a thin minister who has many serious responsibilities, have taken over from the Bank of Italy and then removing the currency monetary sovereignty to the State, inert, since 1992 has allowed this nonsense.

[...] The issue of money through the loan could be considered legitimate when the coin was conceived as a way of Receivables della Riserva e per ciò stesso convertibile in oro, a richiesta del portatore della banconota [...] Poi, cioè una volta abolita la convertibilità e la stessa Riserva anche nelle transazioni delle Banche centrali avvenuta con la fine degli accordi di Bretton Woods del 15 agosto 1971, la Banca di emissione cessa di essere proprietaria della moneta in quanto titolare della Riserva aurea. [...]
Prima Bankitalia, nella sua qualità di società commerciale, fino all'introduzione dell'euro in via esclusiva e successivamente a tale evento, quale promanazione nazionale della Banca centrale europea, si arroga arbitrariamente e illegalmente il diritto di percepire il reddito monetario derivante dalla differenza tra il valore nominale della moneta outstanding, less the costs of production, instead of the state and of Italian citizens.
[...] It seems absurd, but unfortunately is a reality. The euro, however, is of Italian and European citizens, and not, as is happening in Italy, the central bank and private bankers to its members.
Full text here (www.ilgiornale.it - \u200b\u200b"My last fight against the euro") .

Another interesting article in "The Journal" "The banks are cheating investors" where we read:

[...] the debate that resulted in the so-called Fazio affair is not so much on regulation dei poteri e sulla durata in carica del governatore, quanto una meritoria presa di posizione dello Stato italiano di riappropriarsi di risorse, il cosiddetto reddito di “Signoraggio“ , nella quale era stato, seppure in parte, espropriato in favore di soggetti privati. Invero e singolare se non addirittura assolutamente inaccettabile che l'istituto di emissione in uno Stato sovrano sia in primis una società per azioni commerciale, nonché partecipata per la maggioranza assoluta da soggetti privati che nulla hanno a che vedere con le ragioni pubbliche che dovrebbero presidiare ogni determinazione relativa alla Banca centrale [...]


La settimana Previous to the murder, just a complaint, had been indicted six former managers and directors of banks on the Riviera di Ponente on charges of usury.

Diseases To Write About

Bankitalia public participants

Bankitalia public on its website a document containing the shareholders:

http://www.bancaditalia.it/la_banca/ participant Partecipanti.pdf

It is clear the private persons.

It is noted that:
The first 8 participants, themselves, have more half.
INPS, with 15,000 shares, Inail with 2000 shares, state companies are the only participant for the rest SpA all banks and some insurance.

Shelter En Streaming Gay

The control of money. Wear as a system

article from the edition of the newspaper on-line
Rebirth - with gold , bold and italic added Mr Agio -

The term "pecuniary" stems from Latin etymological pecus, sheep, indicating the unit formerly used to regulate trade, as the term "salary" comes from "salt", once used to pay for the work and basic necessities.
The coin was created as a simplified system to facilitate trade and to measure wealth. Since no other wealth than the sum of assets and products of a community, the money should be owned by the same community and the people, and its coinage and its control should be the responsibility of the state.
The amount of money in circulation should be logically equivalent to the value of existing wealth in that time, ie real estate, furniture, supplies and tools used in production.
The state should continuously ensure that this equivalence is maintained : if riches increase, proportionally increasing the volume of currency assets or, if reduced, shrinking the amount of money.
inflation and deflation, economic diseases now so widespread and pernicious, are nothing but the imbalance between the goods on the market and the amount of money in circulation.
To stabilize the purchasing power of money should therefore control the balance between wealth and money in circulation, but this function should be the only Member State, established to pursue the public good. Banks, however, were invented and structured to obtain profits through speculative financial , and the most fertile ground for this work is that of instability, inflation and deflation. It therefore seems obvious that when, as now happens, the control of the economy is left to the banking world, the stability of the purchasing power of money is destined to remain a chimera. And the consequences of this situation and multiply cascade involving every aspect of community life.
When a State, for example, he promoted the construction of public works, which enhances the richness of that community may, therefore, is legitimate and economically correct for increases to pay for the construction of the work, the amount of money assets. It is an aberration in a nation that there is need for new public works and new social services, and be abandoned for lack of funds, leaving many workers unemployed for more. Ezra Pound wrote
: "To say that a state can not pursue their goals because of lack of money, is like saying you can not build roads for lack of kilometers" .
It is not the state money to fly, not the governments to determine monetary policy and the ownership of money is given to the people.
This is actually the culmination of a long process that began with serious mistakes made in the past and consolidated over time. In 1694
, ruler William III of Orange , un gruppo di finanzieri capeggiati da William Paterson prestarono un milione e duecentomila sterline al governo inglese al tasso d'interesse dell'8% annuo . Il re, per ottenere il prestito, concesse alla Banca di Paterson l'autorizzazione a stampare cartamoneta - allora chiamata "nota di banca" - per un importo equivalente alla somma prestata. La Banca si trovò quindi - oltre ad essere proprietaria di un capitale sul quale percepiva gli interessi - a disporre di una massa monetaria fittizia - non corrispondente a nessuna ricchezza reale - con la quale poteva intraprendere fruttuose operazioni finanziarie o concedere prestiti sui quali percepire altri interessi.
Per il governo inglese, che rinunciò a battere paper money in its own - which would have been simpler and more economically less dangerous - began the long and never ending string of interest payable to the Bank, and was allowed into the English invented the circulation of money with which they illegally promoted financial speculation.
Unfortunately, the English example, in later centuries, was followed by almost all governments of the world (the only exception: the Third Reich), allowing to reach the current situation, where no nation is the owner of the currency it uses, and all debtors are Banks' private flying currency.
Banks, at the very moment of their birth, have begun to create fake money - I am thinking of quantity of money circulating in the virtual world today - resulting in a massive fraud against the people. must never forget that the price men must pay for the use of paper money unreal, created from nothing, is the work, production, movable and immovable property, that is real wealth.
when banks began to maintain armored deposits within the values \u200b\u200bof citizens who, for security reasons, they preferred to delegate this task, can also enable the citizens themselves, to fill in the "good transfer" of these valuable for use as a form payment. They are the founders of the modern check.
The banker noted that the tendency of those who filed was directed more to the savings that the use of assets in short: only 10% was handled. He therefore thought it well that would not have risked a lot by creating its own use, received payment for an amount equal to 90% of the values \u200b\u200bstored at the bank. And these receipts were now used to grant loans at interest and participate in fruitful financial assets.
Today we went much further: the money, which the old banker had unlawfully created - not because he is the owner of the goods deposited - was still secured by existing assets, and now is simply printed ex nihilo, with no guarantee or no limit, and has added more virtual money, electronic. La massa di moneta, nelle sue varie forme, attualmente circolante nel mondo ed utilizzata per speculazioni di ogni tipo, è 60 volte superiore a quella usata per lo scambio delle merci.
Un'altra considerazione ci sembra degna di nota: se il popolo fosse il vero proprietario della moneta, questa, al momento del suo conio, dovrebbe essere attribuita allo Stato e non, come oggi avviene, messa a suo debito . E, per di più, il valore monetario nasce dal fatto che il popolo accetta e usa il denaro e non perché qualcuno ha pensato bene di stamparlo. Se lo stesso banchiere avesse emesso pari banconote in un'isola deserta, quale valore potrebbero avere?
Ciò nonostante, le Banche centrali, che sono banche private, create money to the people complaining and cheating on the scam, put it in the budget under "passive". Despite the only expense incurred is the cost of paper, ink and printing.
And the money is paid to the State and the banking institutions that, on such transactions will be charged interest.
This die is now well established that no one raises questions about its inevitability.
Yet something of the opposite sign is already done and continues to happen today. The state actually coined at its mint, coins - for very limited amounts in comparison to those of the paper - and in the past were printed in Italy 500 lire banknotes as "ticket in the course of State Legal. "Citizens do not have certain bearing such a thing, nor realize it when it comes to coins that today, in Euro, are issued by individual states, even for amounts rigidly determined by the Bank Central European. We reached the ridge that now is the state to ask for permission to transfer power to coin money, however small amounts - just the loose change - and not the reverse, as happened in England in 1694, when he began along the path of the big money scam.
To make matters worse you add the "awkward" work of the governors. Giulio Tremonti had recently proposed the replacement of coins 1 and 2 euro for tickets of equal value. Can it be so much incompetence in a minister called to protect the economic interests of the Italians? Or is this a gaffe generated by other "obscure" reasons? Mocking and humiliating the ECB's response was: "We talked about it and in principle we have nothing against that. I hope that the Minister Tremonti is well aware that the proceeds would lose the right to seigniorage on coins" .
The difference between the euro and euro-currency-paper can be seen from the fact that while the card is exactly the same in all countries using the euro, the currencies are customized by the state that the coins in one of the two sides. But people use and spend in the same way paper money and coins.
Why then the State, contrary to what Tremonti proposes, also could not print paper money, so subtracting this privilege to private banks? This would reaffirm the right to monetary sovereignty, essential to the freedom of a people as well as the territorial, military and political.
Thomas Jefferson, U.S. president from 1801 to 1808, had this to say about that: "I think for our freedoms banking institutions are more dangerous enemies of the armies. I already get to the point to set itself up in an aristocracy of money challenge the government. The authority to issue currency they should be torn and restored to the people, which rightly belongs. In reality, the power to make money should be reserved only for the state, which would either put it into service as needed. ".
in the grip of blackmail bank, governments are forced instead to pay big interest likely to affect heavily on the budget of their nations. The citizens must pay taxes, instead of funding public works, are used to cover these interests. In the streets, waterworks, hospitals and all other necessary facilities to the community, the state is therefore forced to seek new loans, on which we all have to pay high taxes to private bankers.
This is an absurd situation and seemingly inevitable enough that the state return to coin money and everything would be solved . Several people saw the possibility of this solution, but so far nobody has been able to spread this idea, in order to create a collective consciousness, which is necessary for a radical rebellion, and no politician is able to activate alternative measures without clashing - disastrously - with strong powers that rule the world.
Two U.S. presidents, in other respects much discussed, tried to reverse.
Abraham Lincoln had printed the "Tickets the United States "- named for their color, greenbacks - which do not bear interest payable to banks. Everyone knows that Lincoln was killed in 1865, leads some historians to link the person of the murderer, John Wilkes Booth, home with Rothschild.
John F. Kennedy tried a similar measure - some notes printed without interest then are still around - but the initiative did not have much time for what happened in Dallas in 1963.
The "seigniorage "is the term over which you indicated the price charged by the ancient kings to ensure, through its effigy stamped on the coins, the weight and purity of gold and silver. Every citizen could in fact lead to mint precious metal to be processed into money and the king held back, as seigniorage, a percentage of the metal.
A practice that still stands in the agricultural life. For example, for the pressing of olives, the owner of the mill keeps to himself around 7.5 percent of the load.
What is now referred to as "monetary income" in fact should not be anything other than the old seigniorage.
If a government agency will take the trouble to print money, spread it, monitor the work of Banks, which would be more legitimate to establish a fee to cover the expenses necessary for the proper functioning of that entity. But the size of modern
seigniorage va ben al di là di una semplice tassa. Il reddito monetario di una Banca di emissione è dato infatti dalla differenza tra la somma degli interessi percepiti sulla cartamoneta emessa e prestata allo Stato e alle Banche minori e il costo - davvero infinitesimale - di carta, inchiostro e stampa, sostenuto per la produzione del denaro.
Se l'Ente di emissione fosse statale il problema avrebbe un peso relativo, innanzitutto perché sparirebbero di colpo gli interessi pagati dallo Stato - che senso avrebbe infatti, per lo Stato, pretendere interessi da se stesso? - poi perché si tratterebbe di utili che, rimanendo in mano allo Stato, apparterrebbero sempre alla collettività.
Il reddito monetario, cioè l'utile di esercizio di una Banca di emissione, viene distribuito invece a tutti i "partecipanti", né più né meno di come accade in una normale Società per azioni.
Ma il problema inerente la natura delle Banche centrali non è tanto quello della quantificazione degli utili e della loro distribuzione - peraltro in alcune nazioni, per attutire gli effetti dell'increscioso balzello monetario, è stata prevista una restituzione allo Stato di una percentuale del signoraggio - quanto il potere esercitato sulla politica monetaria e su tutta l'economia nazionale in conseguenza delle prerogative proprie di un Istituto di emissione: stabilire il tasso di sconto, la politica monetaria e del credito, la concessione dei mutui, ecc.; prerogative the political sphere, in the case of an Institute of the State, but which are related in the case of private institutions, in the interests of economic and financial center for more almost always non-national.

Banks are issuing state or private schools?
In Italy, in 1874 was promulgated for the first time since the birth of the Kingdom, a banking law, to curb emissions of paper money and regulate the competition between the banks that print money. Banks allowed to issue paper money were in fact six: the National Bank of the Kingdom of Italy, the Banca Nazionale Toscana, Banca Toscana Credit, the Roman Bank, Banco di Napoli and Banco di Sicilia. This law also stipulated that the changes in the discount rate should be authorized by the Ministry of Finance.
With the subsequent Act of 1893 , promulgated after the resounding failure of the Banca Romana, the four north-central Italy institutions were merged, creating the Bank of Italy, and were still active, the Banco di Napoli and Banco di Sicily, but with limited roles emission.
must arrive to the years 1926-27 to see given the right to coin money only to Bank of Italy, which thus becomes the central bank.
His nature - defined and regulated in the Statute approved by Royal decree only in 1936 - was defined as a "public institution", but its structure and its properties were those who were: those of a limited company , then transformed into joint-stock company .
The Governor immediately assumed a very important role, not only for monetary management, but also for the whole economic life of the nation. The Charter established the not revoked by the Governor of political power, by giving this power only to the Board of Governors of the Bank of Italy, a technical body and extremely fragmented, and difficult conditions.
In 1926, while he was discussing sull'assetto be given to the Italian banks of issue, the pressure to ensure substantial autonomy and the dismissal of the government were considerable. Benjamin Strong, Governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York intervened directly to Mussolini to obtain guarantees on the independence of the Bank of Italy and the permanence of Bonaldo Stringher in place of his governor, putting on the scales and the support of the Federal Reserve Bank of England to the stabilization of the Italian currency.
Thus, despite numerous currents of fascism pushed towards the nationalization of the Central Bank, the decree of 1936 merely replace the old shareholders with a consortium of organizations and banks, with a prevalence of Savings banks. The Bank of Italy remained then a private bank .
his property, over the years, has not changed: the ownership of Bank of Italy has never been the rule, that is the people, but banks .
And the history of the autonomy of the Bank of Italy has, to date, a sequence of steps more and more significant, all aimed at increasing the gap by the State.
In 1981 - when he was Treasury Minister Beniamino Andreatta and Governor of the Bank of Italy Carlo Azeglio Ciampi - it came to enshrine the right of the Bank not to enter - either partially or in toto - i titoli di Stato; un divorzio sempre più definitivo che dimostrava, senza alcun dubbio, chi deteneva il bandolo della politica monetaria italiana e in quale conto era tenuta l'autorità politica.
Nel 1992 cadde anche la residua possibilità da parte dello Stato di controllare il tasso di sconto: il potere di modificarlo, antico appannaggio del Governo, era stato nel corso dei decenni attribuito al Governatore della Banca d'Italia, che doveva però agire "in concerto" con il ministro del Tesoro.
L'ex Governatore Guido Carli , nei panni di titolare del dicastero economico, il 7 febbraio 1992 fece approvare dal Parlamento l'assoluta autonomia dell'Istituto di emissione in materia di tasso di sconto.
This is a key issue: the debtor gives the creditor the right to unilaterally set the rules of the loan. Rules that are then applied to the entire national economy. What sense can have at this point, the electoral choices, if no candidate, once elected, will be in control of economic levers of credit? Development policy which can be programmed by a government that does not know what it will cost money?
Thus, even the last remnant of the umbilical cord between central bank and political power had been permanently severed. Not only
. Over the decades the people of the world money, not content of the absolute autonomy conquered, have been proposed in an increasingly controllers as more arrogant and often even managers of the political world.
In 1945 the then Governor of the Bank of Italy Luigi Einaudi monetary overlapping his high office with that of Deputy Premier and Minister for the Budget . Einaudi In 1948 he became President of the Republic .
Since then, such cases were multiple and a growing concern: Carli, former Governor, became finance minister, Ciampi, after being Governor is made a minister, then prime minister and finally landed at the Quirinale, Lamberto Dini , general manager of the Bank of Italy has become Prime Minister and then, Antonio Maccanico, former chairman of Mediobanca, has become minister and adviser to the president. There is also to remember the political career of Giuliano Amato - a frequent visitor of the American financial circles - and several times minister and Prime Minister Romano Prodi, the Bank's past from the post of advisor to the chair of Goldman Sachs and then in the Palazzo Chigi President of the European Council. Or Mario Draghi, jubilation by the Treasury to the usual Goldman Sachs (which is the same investment bank that speculated on the devaluation of the lira in 1992).
It is still climbing almost never resulted from political elections, but the result of the alchemy of power operate in absolute contempt popular consent. Beautiful Democracy!
With the advent of the euro and the European Central Bank things got worse. The autonomy enjoyed by the banking sector were strengthened and the remoteness of the locations where you decide and controls have deepened the atmosphere of suspicion and mystery about the world monetary and economic.
is a problem of caste. The count charges that are shared strictly between them, including the untouchables of the national central banks, the offices of the ECB that are attributable to the governments, by statute, must be attributed to "persons of recognized standing and professional experience in monetary or banking ".
While men systematically banks continue to occupy the benches of the politicians, no politician is allowed to enter the buildings blindatissimi money.
There is no minister or prime minister or president of the Republic or by the monarch has the power, the immunity and the term of office at their disposal a president and a director of the European Central Bank. The ECB "indications" binding on governments, sets rates and monetary policy and no political power can interfere.
And the people? Still further, more and more submissive. Beautiful Democracy!
A similar history of other central banks in other countries of Europe and the world.
The more autonomous, the more independent, private is certainly the most blatantly the U.S. Federal Reserve. His property is also closely held secret, as are the secret meetings of its leadership. But his power is obvious, mocking and effective in the U.S. and worldwide. He wrote
Gertrude Coogan : "The Federal Reserve Act was a serious mistake. It gave the international bankers absolute control over the U.S. banking system and, consequently, on all economic activity."
Even in communist regimes, in blatant contradiction with the dictates of Marxist ideology, the issuing bank ended up in the hands of international bankers. Gosbank In 1937, the Institute of emission Soviet, was privatized, and the Board of Directors was granted the jew-American billionaire Armand Hammer.
There was one nation in the twentieth century, which dared to nationalize their banks of issue, recognizing the State and then the people the ownership of the coin: the National Socialist Germany. Reflecting
sull'accanimento criminalizing reserved for Hitler and his followers and the nationalization of the Reichsbank, perhaps you could make an unusual and illuminating explanations of the entire history of the twentieth century.

The owners of the bank and monetary policy
central banks, namely, those who print paper money dei vari paesi del mondo, dunque sono private e i proprietari sono in maggioranza le altre Banche e i grandi finanzieri internazionali.
Ma allora, se il mondo della politica, se i governi, i capi di Stato, i ministri del Tesoro e dell'economia non hanno più voce in capitolo sui tassi di sconto, sulle strategie monetarie, sulle condizioni dei prestiti, sui finanziamenti internazionali, sui cambi, sulle Borse, chi coordina tutto questo complesso mondo di numeri, di previsioni economiche, di interventi piccoli e grandi destinati a influire in maniera determinante sulla vita di tutti i popoli?
Chi prende le decisioni? Chi comanda?
(Occorre) indagare, osservare più da vicino il mondo delle Banche centrali e cercare di individuare the time and the place where they meet and decide.
Yes, because really decide! And the effects of these decisions are before the eyes of all.
So, inquiring, it turns out that in Basel, Banhofplatz to 2, is based Bank for International Settlements, the BIS (or BIS, Bank for International Settlements), founded in 1930, where they meet, each month, the heads of all central banks in the world . Proprietary BIS are in fact all central banks in the world, but in very different proportions between them. 25% of the shares are the U.S. Federal Reserve, 15% of the Bank of England and the remaining 60% is distributed, with shares minimum among all the others. A 60% so fragmented as to render impossible any significant percentage aggregation.
The Federal Reserve, with its 25% ownership and with the constant fawning willingness of the Bank of England, easy to hand in determining the good and the bad weather.
part of the BIS central banks of most industrialized countries of the world - USA, Japan, Germany, France, UK, Italy, Canada, Holland, Belgium, Sweden and Switzerland - have set up special committees of international monitoring: the BCBS, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, the CPSS , Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems, e il CSFG , Comitato sul Sistema Finanziario Globale.
Le nomine dei Governatori delle Banche centrali delle varie nazioni del mondo, prima di giungere alla ratifica dei rispettivi Governi, dove ciò è ancora previsto, devono essere approvate dalla BRI; se a Basilea non sono d'accordo, tutto viene rimesso in gioco, si vagliano altre candidature, più gradite ai signori della Banhofplatz, fino ad individuare l'uomo adatto a gestire, a livello nazionale, le decisioni che vengono assunte lassù, nell'Olimpo dei potentissimi, dei Morgan, dei Rockefeller, dei Warburg, dei Rothschild.
Certo, perché, nonostante i proprietari della Federal Reserve siano tenuti segreti e segrete le loro meetings, it is certain that among them are these men and their share count. Names on for centuries in the history of money and, above all, in climbing the international financial power has done to the detriment of political power.
So who controls the world of money, that the world economy, that the world tout court, it really exists.
In these monthly meetings is to deal with all issues in each country, the discount rates are approved, the beneficiaries of loans from the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, which governments should be supported, facilitated and financed, such as coins and what must take off depreciate, which armed revolutionary movements have to be and what Reforms need to be sponsored. Yes, because who has the power to decide monetary policy can affect in a decisive way, on everything.
Certainly, in the sumptuous halls of the BIS, there has been much discussed and decided, before they were signed agreements Bretton Woods in 1944 , with which it was established, inter alia, that the dollar should be taken as the currency for international trade. Certainly, in the offices of the Banhofplatz 2 was much discussed and decided, before the U.S. president Richard Nixon in August 1971 , announced to the world of the dollar in gold (until then for 35 U.S. dollar had there a guarantee of an ounce of gold). Certainly there has been much discussed in Basel, and decided, before the public opinion of the world become aware of Perestroika, the Treaty of Maastricht, the Euro, the Iraq war, the war in the Balkans, the war on Afghanistan. And probably there was also talk of attacks, of skyscrapers and many other things.
It none, absolutely none of these gentlemen who meet, discuss and decide at 2 Banhofplatz of Basel, has never been a candidate in any list of any political party, was never elected by any voter of any people in the world.
It is therefore this democracy?

Controllers without controls
The rise of the lords of the money has not begun within the political and representative institutions in individual nations. It was developed where the money will produce, within the central bank, the business side by side with a myriad of international institutions, corporations, foundations, commercial banks and all business strictly directed or controlled by them. A web so wide and to allow the gradual cooling of all global activities. The
Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg Group the Club de Paris, the International Monetary Fund Internazionale , la Banca Mondiale , l' Organizzazione Mondiale del Commercio , la Camera di Commercio Internazionale , l' Institute of International Finance , il Forum di Davos ; e ancora, il Comitato di Bali , per la supervisione bancaria, l' IOSCO (International Organisation of Securities Commissions), per la supervisione delle Borse e dei mercati di capitali, l' ISMA (International Securities Market Association), l' IAIS (International Association of Insurance Supervisors), per la vigilanza sulle compagnie di assicurazione, e l' ISO (International Standard Organisation) to which is delegated the task of defining industry standards, to name the most famous and important.
the political and economic conditions of individual nations, through monetary control, it adds the power to influence international relations. It matters little if entire nations in the game of speculation, are swept away and starving - see Latin American countries - and others are to be in a position of undeserved advantage. One example among many that could be done: 30% of the total amount of loans from the International Monetary Fund is currently absorbed by Turkey - helped by its geostrategic position in the Near East - that is to be saved in order not to lose a strong ally United States and Israel.
addition, through the flow of funding, turn on all the initiatives that we believe the functional design and globalist weigh heavily - often up to distort - even those projects which, at first glance might seem the opposite. It particularly clear example is the No Global Movement.
Maurizio Blondet, in his book, No Global, informs us that, contrary to what the public is led to believe, "the International Global Forum is largely funded by the Foundation for Deep Ecology, a think-tank based in San Francisco , heir to the fortunes of tycoon Douglas Tompkins, the owner of Esprit Clothing Company, the well-known multinational pret-a-porter. Such a "Foundation for Deep Ecology" in 2000 said assets for 150 million dollars thanks to these funds, it operates as a holding company, which provides initial capital for the launch of anti-globalization groups around the planet. "
And again: between the "No Global funders of a name stands out: Theodor (Teddy) Goldsmith . [...] Teddy is the younger brother of the late Sir James Goldsmith, global commodities speculator, one of the twelve richest men in the world, a cousin of the Rothschilds. "
proceeding in its investigation, Blondet also highlights the relationships linking the world of No Global to another famous billionaire, George Soros .
"Hungarian-American Jew, Soros has become enormously rich and famous with international speculation on the pound in the 90s, the kind of things you can do in the global market. [...] Soros Foundation is also funding another" cultural ", the Lindesmith Center-Drug Policy Foun-dation, it takes enormous resources to lobby in favor of a policy of full liberalization of the drugs and the legalization of euthanasia, of course in the world. "
So, wherever you're looking for, come out of money, huge amounts of money through which the usual gentlemen, direct, determine, control.
As for Europe, some are led to believe that the Euro is the punto di arrivo spontaneamente perseguito dalle nazioni del Vecchio Continente, nel quadro della loro volontà di unificazione.
Ma, osservando bene, si scopre che anche i fili che hanno mosso questa operazione vengono da lontano e ci conducono sempre ai soliti nomi.
Il professor Joshua Paul , docente della Georgetown University, ha pubblicato nell'autunno del 2000 una serie di documenti del Bilderberg Group , sino ad allora tenuti segreti, che documentano come da cinquant'anni quegli ambienti stessero lavorando perché l'Europa si dotasse di un'unica valuta. Già nel 1948 le Fondazioni Ford e Rockefeller avevano dato vita all'American Committee for a United Europe, con lo scopo di condizionare lo sviluppo monetary, economic and political development of our continent in a convergent interests overseas. A memorandum of the Europe section of the Department of State, on June 11, 1965, contains specific recommendations to the Vice President of the European Economic Community, Robert Marjolin, to arrive at the launch of a single European currency, not as a competitor of the dollar, but as easy means to control the economies of individual European nations.
It is much easier to control a single currency and a single entity independent Central Bank, rather than fifteen and fifteen currencies Institutes of issue with a few remaining links with economic ministers, governments and the political world.
Article 7 of the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and the European Central Bank reads: "Neither the ECB nor a national central bank, nor any member of their decision-making bodies shall seek or take instructions from Community institutions or bodies, from governments Member State or from any other body ".
The central banks of individual European nations, before the Treaty of Maastricht, independence from political power were assessed between 40 and 65% today, after the changes brought about by the advent of the euro, up to 90%.
So, while no influence can come from political power to the ECB, by the top money come to political power continuing claims, which follow these parameters, accurate poles which affect the entire economy of nations. As rightly pointed
Bruno Tarquini, former Public Prosecutor in Teramo, in his The bank, money and wear , "The state has abandoned its monetary sovereignty, transferring it to a private school: this is because, in perfect autonomy and independence, exercising a public function of vital importance for the life of the nation, it is known that monetary policy (ie the issuing currency and regulating the movement and its money market) affects the entire economic system of a state and therefore also affects its policy general, and particularly on the social .
is truly unique as the Treaty of Maastricht bothered to define the ECB only as regards its independence. Papadia Francesco and Carlo Santini, in their European Central Bank, include: "A reading of the treaty shows the particular position of the European Central Bank European Union institutional settings. Article. 4, in fact, not mentioned among the institutions (European Parliament, Council, Commission, Court of Justice and the Court of Auditors) of the Community. The Bank, however, the Treaty confers legal personality and the statute recognizes the broader capacity to act in all Member States. In terms of legal form, the European Central Bank is not, therefore, a Community institution [...] his acts are not attributable to the Community. The European Central Bank has entered into a legal framework that establishes and protects their independence in implementing monetary policy ".
The ECB therefore determines, in complete autonomy - as if that did not have political and social - the level official interest rates, the cost of money, that is the policy of monetary expansion or restriction. And, if not more, shall establish and lead, in perfect independence, all the buying and selling of the euro against other currencies on market exchange rates. And the national central banks must comply in all respects with the directives of the ECB - the Governing Council shall closely monitor - if not rap on the fingers, with all the power to do so.
The ECB, and consequently all the national central banks, officially - now it is written clearly, in black and white, in the treaties and regulations - can not be granted for any reason, loans to states or the European Community or any other public entity, and therefore they are forbidden to buy government bonds, both at the time of that later.
Not only that, if the first few Maastricht Central Bank, as already mentioned, could provide a partial rebate State of seigniorage - income obtained through monetary policy - the ECB is obliged not to release even a penny from the coffers of the European System of Central Banks.
And yet, while the debates and sessions of the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate are open to the public, the judgments of courts of justice must be justified in detail and published, the meetings of the Governing Council are absolutely secret and is the same Council which, in turn, decide whether to publish its decisions, to publish only certain parts or not to publish.
Finally, icing on the cake, the ECB managers enjoy substantial immunity. Are not in fact provided, in the ECB, penalties for improper behavior. In the Regulations states that it is simply the risk of losing credibility and trust to ensure the certainty of the performance of managers. Only in case of serious crimes and conduct clearly unlawful, the Court of Justice may intervene and take up the case.
The loss of monetary sovereignty and legislative - the essential parts of national sovereignty - by the European countries has been irrevocably established. And on the sly.
In Italy, as pointed out Ida Magli the Journal on 11 March 2001, "The law of constitutional reform, approved by a majority of the left in great haste a few hours before the dissolution of Parliament, there is a fundamental step and yet has not been brought to the attention of citizens, either before or after its approval. It 's Article 117 which states: "Legislative power is vested in the State and the Regions in accordance with the Constitution and with the constraints deriving from EU and international obligations." In these three lines is coded the loss of legislative sovereignty of Italy. This is why Article 117 has not been discussed openly: the Italians do not need to know ".
Perhaps democracy is this. Somewhere he felt the need to involve and listen to the people through regular referendums, and there - see the case of Denmark - Maastricht and Euro remained a dead letter. The people said no. But these are rare, indeed unique, exception.
very democratic, with all the other European countries has been ordered to comply with the American model without right of reply, without any referendum.

The regaining of national sovereignty
era of virtual money, the e-money, ie money that does not exist, but that can determine the welfare or poverty for entire populations, wealth or ruin whole categories is, after all, logical that the dominant political system that is democratic, where "sovereign" should be the people, but to decide only the bankers and their lobbyists, which are mixed with the alchemy monetary popular referendum where the majority may be 13%, where freedom is exchanged with the obligation consuming, the dignity with possession of a credit card, home security listed on a stock exchange, life with the story of a bank account.
the face of the topical themes of the only answers are those inspired by the interest of the usual financial groups. And no one rebels because there is a more representative and influential political power from which to expect different responses, independent, inspired by the interest of the community.
... Maybe men are beginning to realize who the real enemies , and are beginning to hate them.
The turning point that will lead to the collapse of tyranny monetary policy and the regaining of national sovereignty is probably much closer than that before the power of global financial lobbies, would be led to believe.
Prepare hard times, very hard, such as those that are already experiencing the Argentines.
step will be a traumatic, traumatic pain, because all resources are now in the hands of these gentlemen, and most of our quality work has been turned upside down: the global village has destroyed the maker of the finished product and replaced it with the worker forced to build a bolt, or only to a gear assembly and the messenger only able to deliver what the multinationals have marketed.
We relearn what made us forget. We will find the courage to undertake new ways, solutions. We should get rid of money-swindling bankers and all their blackmail and found, finally, a real currency, the people. When the chloroform
welfare consumerism has finished, when the hubbub of gadgets, mobile phones, computers will go haywire when the carnival of supermarkets and shopping malls will be left without products, the people necessarily will have to rediscover, re-found, return to exist with its own specific identity and culture.
Our people have already demonstrated on many occasions to be able to overcome tremendous evidence, developing a strong and united capacity now above suspicion. Indeed, the best qualities we have expressed in times harder and that of reconstruction. Quality which the gentlemen of the international banks do not even suspect, and certainly not expected.
The peoples of Europe, now reduced to laborers for services necessary for the development of the new economy, globalization and multinational corporations, will find their own productive and creative. Not quite exhausted, hungry, accampati accanto agli aeroporti, ad attendere l'arrivo degli "aiuti umanitari", come avviene in molti paesi del terzo mondo.
I popoli europei non accetteranno i nuovi ricatti di qualche nuova Banca internazionale e sapranno ritrovare la sopita passione per la libertà e l'indipendenza.
La lotta per la Libertà è una costante nella storia degli uomini. La lotta dei popoli per la Libertà e la Sovranità sarà il tema dominante della storia di domani.

Quotes For Facebook Picnik

The Bank of Italy, "reserves of the Republic"

Lettera al direttore del "Corriere della Sera" Sergio Romano, pubblicata sull'edizione on-line del giornale il 13 settembre 2005.
-domanda del lettore-
Mi riferisco at its bottom, "The Italian mess" and I read with astonishment that the Annual Report of the Bank of Italy Fazio "was" a discourse of the Crown "listened to religiously by all the political and economic barons of the Republic." And the annual reports of the Bank of Italy of all the other Governors, to be Menichella Carli, Whiskers by Ciampi, with tips and guidelines for economic policy, not just credit, to be taken, were not equal 'discourse of the Crown "? It was not the governor Menichella that extra cathedra, in 1957, at a meeting to ABA approved the Vanoni Plan?
As Guido Carli, it was ignored in his many public policy interventions by the barons of that time? And yet il governatore Ciampi non vedeva assistere alle sue Relazioni annuali tutto il fior fiore politico economico e sindacale d'Italia, quando indicava e suggeriva temi di politica economica da adottare?
--------
-risposta del Direttore-
Caro De Angelis, le sue osservazioni sono giuste. Nel panorama delle banche centrali europee il governatore di Via Nazionale fu sempre, soprattutto dopo la fine della Seconda guerra mondiale, un personaggio anomalo, una specie di consigliere straordinario del governo con rango quasi ministeriale a cui era permesso esprimere giudizi sulla situazione economica nazionale e a cui venivano conferiti talvolta incarichi speciali. Lei ha giustamente ricordato il placet di Donato Menichella al piano Vanoni developing employment and income in the period 1955-1964. But he could also be recalled that in early 1950, when he was governor for less than two years, Menichella conceived the project of the Bank of the South and wrote the law that established it. This style was pioneered by Luigi Einaudi (who was for a short period, at the same time, the governor and Budget Minister ) and was inherited by his successors. A text of 1988 published by Books Scheiwiller ("Memories of the Governor) Guido Carli wrote that this anomaly was also observed by many foreign bankers. The President of the International Monetary Fund to Jacobbson said one day: «In tutti i Paesi le banche centrali lottano per conquistare la propria indipendenza dai governi, in Italia il governo lotta per conquistare la propria indipendenza dalla Banca centrale» . Esiste una spiegazione, naturalmente. Dopo la caduta del fascismo e il ritorno alla democrazia parlamentare l'Italia fu governata da qualche vecchio esponente della classe politica prefascista e da uomini che avevano passato gli anni del regime all'estero o in qualche «santuario» come l'ufficio studi della Banca Commerciale: persone spesso colte, intelligenti e coraggiose, ma arrugginite o inesperte e bisognose di collaboratori competenti, soprattutto in materia di moneta e finanza. La Banca d'Italia, sotto la direzione di Einaudi, svolse egregiamente this function, and later became, in a country plagued by chronic political instability, a rock of reliability and continuity. As we had the rebuttal stating that the establishment of the National Road was, for the political leadership of the country, a 'retention of the Republic. " Einaudi became minister of Budget and head of state. Guido Carli was finance minister in Andreotti's last government and signed the Treaty of Maastricht. Lamberto Dini was treasury minister in the Berlusconi government in 1994, prime minister, foreign minister after the victory of the center in the 1996 elections. Carlo Azeglio Ciampi was prime minister and finance minister, and is now president. What other democracy, the Central Bank gave the country over fifty years, two heads of state? but governments, despite their prestige, they were always impeccably sober, shy, reluctant to preach publicly. Menichella resigned in 1960 at the age of 64 years. Guido Carli went 19 August 1975 after "a day like any other" and exchanged greetings with his successor in the gilded hall of the Palazzo Koch. Paolo Baffi was hit with absurd accusations and resigned to avoid a judicial investigation on the work of the governor was bad to the prestige of the institution. Do not you think, dear De Angelis, who between the past and the present there is a difference?

Dandruff Shampoo Make Yeast Rise Or Fall

Letters to the editor of The Republic

Letter to Vittorio Zucconi published on Monday 12 September on the heading "Letters to the editor" on the online site of the newspaper La Repubblica

The bank and the stand
Dear Editor,
money control the world. Considered owners of them relying on a legal vacuum (nowhere sanctions the ownership of money on issue) is a privilege unsurpassed, you think about it. Wishing could also deepen the difference between "business of state" and "bank notes": one does not create debt, the other absolutely from you. Because the former does not exist more time? I invite you to search for "seigniorage", "Giacinto Auriti" or "induced value" in a search engine on the Internet to become better informed on this issue. Thanks for reading, I'd be happy to read your reply.
Best wishes and happy Sunday.

- reply - This money that control the world's news to me. Waiting to resolve the issue of who should print paper money, I modestly I'd be happy to see a governor of the Bank of Italy that did not make the affarucci them with his friends in the parrocchietta.

=========================

Lettera di DiMondi a Vittorio Zucconi pubblicata sabato 10 settembre sulla rubrica "Lettere al direttore" sul sito on line del giornale La Repubblica

BATTERE MONETA
Caro Direttore,

in questi giorni di grande confusione, sfiducia e sospetti sul ruolo della Banca d'Italia (una s. p. a. una banca privata di banchieri privati + assicurazioni e Inps) nella politica economica e finanziaria del nostro paese, appare sempre più evidente che la Banca d'Italia e le altre banche (sono loro che stampano i soldi di carta), si comportano come tutte le Corporation, non are geared to age but the only gain. If it was the state to print its own currency, coins as their pennies, he suddenly extinguished the monstrous public debt burden on all citizens and that puts a big mortgage on our future. I am well aware that this observation can be argued that a pure ingenuity, but the quotation of Maurice Allais, Nobel Prize for Economics in 1988 stated that "the current money creation made ex nihilo (from nothing =) from the banking system identical to the creation of money by counterfeiters. The only difference is that they are different people who profit from them "what can you object? Thank you for your hospitality and for his opinion, very welcome. Greetings to all Dimond

- reply - The problem is not "who is printing money", but "those who control who is printing money." If you could imagine the government also had absolute authority to coin money as beating the laws? The Weimar remember anything?

Dominant Women Dressed In Leather

grand council

by http://www.ilriformista.it/rubriche/documenti/testo.aspx?id_gpl=46

To get an idea of \u200b\u200bgovernance Bank of Italy, one must look to Board which is responsible for the appointment of the governor. The 13 directors are highly respected personalities some of which are known and others unknown to most, but no less important. Among the first industries such as Giordano Zucchi same name whose textile company has just announced it will cut 750 of 1700 workers because they can not make it to withstand the competition. Or the president emeritus of the Constitutional Court, Cesare Mirabelli , principal legal adviser of Antonio Fazio, an expert on canon law and director of the Vatican State. With him and with his friend Paolo Emilio Ferreri , eighty years old Turin lawyer and adviser Elder, the governor is heard on the phone to be told that there is no reason to convene an extraordinary meeting, advance notice from the same Ferreri The Wall Street Journal. We find that members can be defined as close to the center of onomima Paul Laterza publishing house, Stefano Fossati, an entrepreneur from Bologna to the circle of the Mill, or Ignazio Musu, arrived just two months, a professor at Ca 'Foscari, former Councillor Margaret's much appreciated by the Mayor of Venice Massimo Cacciari. But there were people close to the center as the owner Giovanni Montanari chairman of the port of Ancona and Gavino Pirri, tax auditor of the company that manages the airport of Cagliari and local member of Confindustria. They are entrusted with the protection of the autonomy of the central bank. In agreement with the Governor, ça va sans dire.